Problem
A report on funds raised or activities held is not enough to trace the connection between programme promises, resource use and outcomes.
Mechanism
The proposal is to study a specialised independent nonprofit for voluntary programme review: connect funding, commitments, spending and outcomes, agreeing the scope, criteria and information access in advance. Independence requires conflict-of-interest disclosure, a transparent method and explicit uncertainty; missing evidence is not proof of a violation. This is civil-society monitoring, not state supervision: it does not replace authorised public bodies’ inspections or confer their supervisory powers. The organisation’s establishment and the model’s legal arrangements are not confirmed here.
Demonstration
No dedicated demonstration yet; no assessments of real organisations are published.
Research hypothesis
Voluntary independent review of resource-to-outcome links may improve accountability without automatic ratings or unsupported accusations. Evaluation should cover verifiability, independence, programme workload and review costs.
Status
Concept
Effectiveness has not been established.
Participate
Propose a synthetic programme, independence criteria or a method for checking how expenditure relates to results. Do not send allegations against real organisations or confidential documents. Discuss this archived material